Blogawler


Have your say

Write to the Development Panel!  Have your say about Gawler East traffic and infrastructure concerns.  It may be your last chance to be heard!

Once was Green

Once was Green



Community Voice

Opportunity for community to have a say.

On Monday night, the 22nd of June, a community meeting was convened at the Gawler Arms by members of the Urban Growth Boundary Community Forum Committee to look at the implications surrounding the recently released DPA for the proposed Gawler East Development.

The meeting was attended by about 80 people, including representatives from both major political parties.

Meeting Convenor Mr Paul Koch, said that the night gave local residents the opportunity to look in more detail about the implications of the development.
“Views on the night ranged from concerns about traffic, the social impact, increased demand on already stretched services through to the appropriateness of the site for a major development and whether the community has an effective voice in the consultation process.”

People at the meeting were urged to put in a submission to the State Government by the 16th of July as this will be last formal opportunity they have to influence the decision. People should indicate if they wish to speak at the public hearing on the 30th of July.

Mr Koch also said that “ people were encouraged to talk to their friends and neighbours to look closely at the issues, as the development will have a major impact on all people living in Gawler, not just the people living in Gawler East and Gawler South“.

Writing a submission

It is best to write your own, but  a form letter is available with space in the centre of the page for you to use.  Click  base form letter and save, then remove the instruction and then type in your concerns and save it.  Any further questions please e-mail us at blogawler@gmail.com.

Base form letter provides a pdf version of the framework for a submission for you to write on – open it up and print it off.

If you want to speak at the public hearing on 30th July you must indicate this in your submission.

Sending your submission.

Submissions need to arrive at the DPA Committee by 16th July.

You can post them to

Presiding Member, Development Policy Advisory Committee
C/- Department of Planning and Local Government
Level 3, 136 North Tce, Adelaide SA 5000

email them to      dpac@saugov.sa.gov.au

or place them in a collection box located at Crosby’s of Gawler, Gawler Cinemas, Willaston Bookshop and the Cheek Avenue Super Deli.  Submissions will be collected and ‘bulk mailed’ off.

If you need any help with your submissions you can contact Helen Wilmore on            85 223019 who will be able to give you a hand.



Community voice on Gawler’s future
June 11, 2009, 6:23 am
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , ,

The recent release of the Gawler East Development Plan Amendment (DPA) has finally given the community the opportunity to look closely at the proposal.

The DPA gives a very broad overview of the types of development that would be permitted in different distinct zones across the site.

To help the community start to get an understanding of the DPA and the approval process, the Gawler Town Council held a very successful information session on the 10th of June. This session outlined the background and policy content within the DPA. Throughout the session it was reinforced that the community has an opportunity to make a submission to the State Government by the 16th of July. When making a submission you can also request to make a presentation on the 30th July.

Unfortunately, the session did not give the opportunity for the community to ‘drill down’ and look at the implications of different policies outlined in the DPA. In effect, what will be the on-the-ground impacts on traffic, access to services, environmental impacts etc. To help the community come to grips with the actual implication of the DPA on the future of Gawler, a community forum has been organised for the 22nd of June.
It will be held at the Gawler Arms, starting at 7.30. It will take the form of a workshop where people can break up into groups and discuss the issues they are concerned about. There will also be people with particular expertise available who will be able to provide some interpretation.
It is hoped that information gained from the workshop will help to frame a submission to the Government that reflects your concerns.

The approval process for the DPA has now moved into a ‘political phase’. It is important that the Government receives a clear message about the concerns residents have around this proposed development and the out comes it will have on the town of Gawler.

Other opportunities you will have to express your concerns include a petition now circulating in the community. It essentially asks the Government to delay making a decision on approval until community issues are fully addressed. Also a ‘form letter’ will be delivered to each house in Gawler. This will help you to record and make your concerns heard about the development.

We encourage all members of the community to take the opportunity to look closely at the issues surrounding the DPA and the impacts they will have on the town of Gawler.

The policies outlined in the DPA will have long-term and irreversible impacts for Gawler. It is important to have your voice heard by the Government before the 16th of July.

If your require further information contact
Scott Fraser on 85233 220 or Paul Koch on 85232859.



KNOCK-ON EFFECT.
January 14, 2009, 12:51 am
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , ,

KNOCK-ON  EFFECT.

 

The Delfin publicity machine has been working overtime recently, producing glossy plans and rolling out the promises.

 

The devil is always in the detail and one of  the first of these is the effect on the residents of Sunnydale Avenue. It was pronounced recently that their street would become part of the gleaming new collector road between Lyndoch  and Calton Roads  and into the new development.

 

The residents held a meeting recently where they voiced their outrage about this rural road being turned into a major carriageway, whisking cars and trucks through and around Gawler.

The promise of new kerbs and gutters are no consolation for turning their lives upside down with increased noise, fumes and safety concerns.

 

Be under no illusions that urban growth around Gawler, with the potential of tripling the population, will have major negative effects on the whole town. Sunnydale Avenue is one of the first examples.

 

This is the time to demand that the Government show leadership and invest resources into detailed investigations and modelling of the effects of urban growth on the town.

 

It  would also be an act of openness and true community consultation if the Government and the developer released studies as they were completed, not just at the last minute which creates a flood of information. By doing this it would create an environment for open, ongoing discussion and dialogue instead of the situation we now have leading to community uncertainty and unrest.

 

Only after all investigations have been completed and discussed will we be anywhere near understanding the long-term effects and be able decide if it is feasible and/or reasonable to approve development plans.

 

The Government should stand up  for the community and not be held to the timetables of developers and their commercial interests.

 

 

 



Understand the issues and then allocate funds.

 

 

The Urban Growth Community Forum Committee has written to the Minister for Urban Development, Mr Holloway regarding the approval process for the Gawler East development site.

 

The committee is calling on the Minister to ensure the approval process is not rushed and to guarantee the finances of any infrastructure needs. In particular they are calling on the Minister to conduct an Environmental Impact Study of the development on the site as this would address many of the concerns expressed by the community.

 

The committee has voiced its concerns regarding the speed at which the proposal is being pushed. Given the timetable outlined by the developer it appears decisions will be made well before critical investigation have been completed and then assessed.

 

Also, given the current economic turmoil, the committee is requesting that all infrastructure requirements be costed and budgeted for before approval is given.

In particular, given the already over crowded roads, that any SE bypass be allocated funds well before any actual work on the site begins. This will ensure any bypass will be built and not lost in State Government cutbacks to balance stretched budgets.

 

The committee is very concerned about the approval process for the Gawler East site. It feels good process is being pushed to one side at grave cost to the residents of Gawler and surrounding areas.

 



A fast track the Community doesn’t approve

 Delfin outlines its timetable for Gawler East Development.

 

The Urban Growth Community Forum Committee is very concerned about a number of planning and approval issues related to the Delfin Gawler East Development. 

The Committee has identified a number of worrying issues in the Delfin produced newsletter entitled Gawler East Development Update, Spring 2008.

 

The timetable identified by Delfin for rezoning approval seems to be out of sequence with a number of major studies that are currently being undertaken. In the timetable provided, there is no mention of major studies including the effects of traffic issues in and around Gawler. It is being suggested that the proposed Development Plan changes will go on public display before these studies are available.  “This is of major concern to people living in Gawler who already have to cope with increasingly clogged road systems and seem to be putting the cart before the horse” a committee spokesperson said.

 

The Update seems to imply that the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for the site has been signed between Delfin, Gawler Council and State Government. As we now know the State Government has not signed the agreement.

The Committee considers it is misleading to say that the MoU has been signed.  The Committee would also like to know why the Minister has been unable to sign the MoU.

 

The Delfin Update also quotes statements implying that the area has already been rezoned or that rezoning is a mere formality. For people who are not following the detail of process this could be misleading.

 

The Committee feels that there is an attempt to heighten the expectation that the development will be approved and put pressure on Government to fast track the process.

 

The Committee calls on the Minister to make a public commitment to allow all investigations and studies to be completed before rezoning is proposed.. When completed these studies should be part of the community consultation process with enough time for all issues to addressed.  The Committee notes the detailed Environmental Impact Study for the Buckland Park site and requests a similar process for Gawler East. In particular, to ensure that all infrastructure issues such as traffic, public transport, water and sewerage are dealt with along with other environmental issues such as genuinely understanding the hydrology of the site and considering the effects on ground fed springs in local rivers and the ramification to the current users of ground sourced water for human and stock needs.

 

Delfin is a large corporation with a very sophisticated media machine that is very effective in delivering their message. The Committee is calling on the Government to ensure that the community’s voice is also heard by listening to their concerns and with a commitment to not rush a decision that will have irreversible effects on the town of Gawler.

 

 

 

 



Opposition talks about Urban Growth
July 29, 2008, 11:09 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , ,

Press release.

 

David Ridgway visits Gawler to talk about urban growth.

 

Mr David Ridgway, Opposition spokesperson on Urban Development and Planning visited Gawler last week after an invitation from the Urban Growth Boundary Community Forum Committee.

 

A spokesperson for the Committee said that members outlined community concerns in the Barossa, Gawler and Playford areas about proposed urban growth.  Issues discussed included the lack of appropriate consultation before decisions were announced, lack of information about the potential impact of urban expansion on local communities and concern that the timing of decisions being directed by political expediency rather than based on solid planning.

 

Issues noted of particular relevance to the proposed developments at Gawler East and Concordia involving Gawler and Barossa councils included uncertainities about water, power and sewerage infrastructure, issues of traffic build up affecting the Gawler area, environmental and heritage issues, impacts on nearby river ecosystems and the need to protect quality rural land from urban development.

 

Mr Ridgway outlined the directions that would guide Opposition policies on the issues and particularly stressed concerns about lack of transport and other infrastructure and protection of productive rural land. 

 

Spokesperson for Urban Growth Boundary Community Forum, Mr Paul Koch said that the Committee appreciated Mr Ridgeway’s involvement and would continue to press all political parties in the State to understand of the depth of concern there is in the local community and to respond with policies that protected community interests.

 

 

 



Closed doors, glossy spin

In the recent State Budget there was a focus on public transport, in particular expenditure on light rain / trams to Port Adelaide and West Lakes. This improvement of infrastructure opens the door to developing appropriate medium/ high-density housing around transport hubs.

This type of development close to the centre of Adelaide will bring work, study and entertainment etc to within 15 minutes of travel. A denser European style of housing is proposed.  Hopefully this signals the end of the American style of urban sprawl, that relies on more and more motor vehicles to access work and services.  In a world with ever increasing fuel prices that must be a good thing.

 

At a local level we need to continually question the long-term sustainability of developments such as Gawler East, especially now that the development has been announced.

 

Up till now there has been mostly closed door discussions with Delfin, State Government and Councils about this development. It is surely now time for open and genuine consultation and dialogue with the community.

 

It is important the community not be simply treated to a ‘glossy sales pitch’ regarding the supposed ‘benefits’ of the development. There needs to be substantive investigation into all environment, social, heritage and traffic management implication on and off the site. Important issues must not be simply brushed aside for expediency.  The community needs real information and a real say without a timetable that precludes proper community discussion.

 

If a process is rushed, the outcomes in most cases are dire. Act in haste, repent at leisure is a saying which comes to mind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Traffic Concerns

Increasingly the wider community is becoming attuned to rising fuel prices and the cost of running a car, in particular driving to work. More and more people are using trains, buses and trams to commute to work if possible.

With the cost of fuel rising, it is becoming evident that it is not viable to simply keep pushing population growth out onto the urban fringe and then force people to rely on cars to get to work.

We currently have proposals to push the urban boundary further from the metropolitan heart. When the cost of fuel edges towards $2 a litre what will be the financial impact on people in these new developments? A more enlightened and sustainable view is to develop appropriate housing close to employment and services.

 

At a local level, traffic in and around Gawler is a constant problem. Murray Street is almost at capacity and the Government is conducting a traffic survey and looking at the impacts of different developments on traffic flows and movements.

A proposed solution is to create bypasses to accommodate the new housing developments but this will not solve the problems caused when these new residents want to travel into Gawler to access shops and services. Gawler, with its current traffic problems, is already a commercial destination, and the new developments of Target and off Para Road will draw additional traffic into the town.

 

It is inevitable that doubling our population with new housing developments will add to our traffic problems in Gawler, not solve it.

 

Hopefully the Government will start to take a more long-term view of urban development taking into account social and environmental outcomes. To do this they need to consider local concerns and not simply adopt solutions that seemed suitable last century.

 

 

 

 

 

 



Things just don’t add up.

 

Increasing the community is raising concerns about urban growth and it’s long-term impacts.

The worrying trend though, is that developers are not releasing information about the plans they have. It increasingly looks like developers will simply push their plans onto communities with little regard for the wider, overall impact that new developments have.

 

In the Gawler East development we can see this being played out. There are sufficient indications that the developer has drawn up detailed plans for the area. It can reasonably be assumed that they will plan to maximise their profits with the possibility of over 4000 building allotments. This translates to around 10,000 more people in Gawler. Add in the new developments in the pipeline of around another 10,000 to be housed in Southern Gawler and the population doubles in a very short period of time. Our current population is around 20,000.

What will be the impacts on our community with this sudden increase of our population? Without proper studies and assessments we are only guessing.

 

When developers plan new estates they rarely look beyond their boundaries to impacts population increase have on the wider community. 

In particular, everyone living in Gawler understands the problems we currently have with traffic.

This is an ongoing concern that has been echoed by a number of different groups and organisations in the community. For example the Gawler Business Development Board (Bunyip April 10th 2008) have identified traffic management issues in Gawler as a serious problem that needs to be resolved.

Does any one seriously believe our current traffic managements problems will be solved by doubling the population of Gawler?

 

There is an urgent need to stand back from this rush to develop and undertake detailed independent assessments of the long-term effects of this new development.

We as a community need to fully understand what will be the costs, environmentally and socially as well as the day-to-day impacts on our lives from this development.

 

It needs to be firstly established if having a development at Gawler East is in fact feasible or desirable. There appears to be an assumption that it is, simply because a line has been drawn on a map

 

At the moment the whole process does not seem to be open to the community to assess.

The developer will want to maximise the returns to its shareholders. The community wants to be happy that this profit is not paid for through its loss.