Blogawler

We see that for the second week in a row The Bunyip’s ‘CIT on the grapevine’ has run his diatribe about Gawler’s ‘emerging left-wing anti-development fraternity’. Did you not get sufficient reaction last week CIT or are you just low on material? Seriously though, in all of the debate we really haven’t heard an ‘anti-development line’. What we have heard is an almost unanimous call for issues of infrastructure to be researched, planned and resolved before the Urban Growth Boundary is extended. We shouldn’t have thought that was anything to do with being ‘left-wing’ or ‘anti-development’ but simply about putting good planning and proper ‘community building’ ahead of a quick developer profit. Also, we’re wondering when CIT is going to declare his ‘conflict of interest’. Doesn’t he stand to make quite a bit of money when (if) his land is rezoned for urban development??