Blogawler


Draft “Commitment” Deed for Gawler East. What’s next?

It is important that the draft “commitment” deed for Gawler East has finally been released.

Although it is a working document it does provide a very good indication of the possible make up of the final deed.

What is very interesting is the lack of financial commitment by Delfin Lend Lease.

 In fact Delfin is quite upfront about their primary objective: achieve commercially acceptable returns.

Reading the document it sounds that Government departments and the community become de-facto agents of Delfin to ensure they turn a profit.

Issues like undergrounding the power and water (which are vital for Delfin to ensure the housing density they need) are placed at the feet of the organisations that own them. It is proposed they are pay for the upfront cost. An ‘equitable portion’ will be recouped from, for example Delfin, in a manner to be agreed with Delfin after the site  is developed. There is no commitment to pay all of the cost, just a proportion sometime in the future.

The connector road from the north to the south of the development is proposed to be funded by the State Government and the Gawler Council. It will be a local road and is therefore unlikely to provide any long-term solutions to general traffic congestion in the town

A very worrying point is the proposed location of a waste water treatment plant, water storage dams and power generation within the Para Woodlands Conservation Park. The Para Woodlands, with funds to manage it, was generously donated to the whole community for revegetation and as a sanctuary for animal life. This Park is an important element in the State’s program to halt species loss, ensuing the long-term survival of plants and animals.

Proposing to site infrastructure in Para Woodlands shows a total disregard for the value the community places on its conservation area over the need for profit.

The document shows how a situation can be skewed towards one entity at the expense of others.  The document highlights the problems that are generated when projects are rushed. It looks more and more like Delfin has not done its home work before bidding for the site and now is trying to reduce its financial obligations to ensure its profitability.

 Surely this process is not healthy for the developer or the community. If a structure plan had been completed originally, developers would be able to bid for land knowing full well the cost  to develop the site.

We currently have a developer who at the beginning of the process was promising a lot of outcomes. They propose to back away from many of them and are relying on the community to fill the gaps in their plans.

 The whole approval process should be halted until all the issues around the development are resolved.  The State Government and Gawler and Barossa councils need to avoid  a rushed process favoured by a powerful corporation that believes it can bring pressure to bear politically



Inconvenient Truths to emerge at Gawler Arms

Great to see there are some people out there who are joining the dots between climate change, urban sprawl and water security!

There’s to be a public lecture upstairs at the Gawler Arms on Thursday 7th February, 7.30pm:

Speakers are

Michael Doherty, giving former US Vice President Al Gore’s global warming talk

Paul Downton, Award-winning architect, on the environmental impact of urban sprawl

Chris Marles, Manager Commercial Development SA Water, on managing water use and retention in a sustainable way during the planning process

Hope they’ve invited some Ministers!

resizeimgp1729.jpg



Urban Growth Boundary Extension is ‘Carbon-Reckless’

How very short-sighted and disappointing that Minister Holloway has decided not only to extend the urban growth boundary but throw in an extra 79 Ha at Evanston Gardens without any consultation whatsoever!

We read with amusement yesterday that Mike Rann is aiming to make his state cabinet ‘carbon neutral’. He is quoted as saying that cabinet ministers produce an estimated 3,000 tonnes of greenhouses gases a year. Hang on a minute – what about all the extra carbon emissions emanating from their decision to allow thousands of fringe houses which will only be accessible by car?

If the state government were seriously concerned about carbon emissions they would have calculated the ‘true carbon cost’ of extending the urban growth boundary into areas like Concordia and Gawler East, where houses will be far from the city and unserviced by public transport. How different would that decision be with some ‘carbon-transparency’ involved?

‘Consultation’ without asking the public what they think, ‘Carbon Neutrality’ divorced from the consequences of cabinet decisions – At the moment it’s all just empty rhetoric and media spin from Mike Rann’s brigade of ‘Carbon-Neutral Pretenders’ aka State Cabinet.

 



30,000 extra car movements a day

Those 30,000 extra car movements a day on Calton Rd are going to make getting across to that playground a little trickier!calton-road2resize.jpg

At the forum conducted by the Local Member this Monday there were no reasonable  solutions provided for the projected increase in traffic. In fact it was suggested that the majority of traffic movements in Gawler are by residents carrying out their normal daily activities such as school drop offs and pick ups, shopping, accessing services etc. An increase in population around Gawler will only add the the already dangerously high traffic pressures. Proposed by-passes would not greatly reduce the traffic pressure. Answers to why Gawler is the ideal site for urban expansion are needed,  not half- baked ideas about possible solutions.



Gawler not Sprawler

Planning SA’s original public consultation document on extending the Urban Growth Boundary extolled the virtues of the idea in Gawler East because it was all about rehabilitating the quarry.  However, when you look at an aerial shot of the Gawler East area – there’s an awful lot of rural land surrounding the quarry that’s been included in the proposed area (see land inside black outline)!

quarryoutlinecrop.jpg



Gawler Urban Growth Boundary Forum Committee

Proposed Gawler East Development Site - mostly rural land

Formed at the public meeting on Urban Boundary changes on 20th August 2007, the Gawler Urban Growth Boundary Forum Committee has been busy collecting signatures from residents who want to see much more consultation and a lot more information before anything goes ahead.

Above is a photo of the rural land at Gawler East which is likely to be developed if the UGB changes go ahead.

Attached is a copy of the Forum Committee’s submission to Minister Holloway.
It details many concerns of local people, including:

  • traffic congestion and issues of safety.
  • Loss of the scenic views as you come into Gawler from One Tree Hill and the Barossa (the photo above is of the current view from One Tree Hill Rd)
  • The loss of the character of Gawler
  • Availability of water for new development
  • Extension of train services
  • Overall community infrastructure.

Have a read for yourself and see if you agree! ugb-sub-forum.doc

the Blogawler Team



Planning Institute critical of Government’s UGB changes

In a strongly worded submission the Planning Institute of Australia (SA) says the State Government’s sudden proposal to extend the urban boundary ‘lacks some credibility’ and that the four week consultation process could be seen as a ‘token effort’.  The PIA’s submission calls on the Government to set out a ‘publicly known set of principles and criteria’ for urban boundary review and to engage in ‘meaningful and collaborative consultation with local government’.  The PIA calls the current focus on metro-fringe land releases (as the main way to deal with population growth) ’short-sighted’ and calls for ’stronger emphasis on other growth solutions, including urban redevelopment and growth in the state’s rural and regional centres’.
Go the PIA! The submission is available for download at the planning institute website



The Bunyip’s CIT starting to sound a bit repetitious

We see that for the second week in a row The Bunyip’s ‘CIT on the grapevine’ has run his diatribe about Gawler’s ‘emerging left-wing anti-development fraternity’. Did you not get sufficient reaction last week CIT or are you just low on material? Seriously though, in all of the debate we really haven’t heard an ‘anti-development line’. What we have heard is an almost unanimous call for issues of infrastructure to be researched, planned and resolved before the Urban Growth Boundary is extended. We shouldn’t have thought that was anything to do with being ‘left-wing’ or ‘anti-development’ but simply about putting good planning and proper ‘community building’ ahead of a quick developer profit. Also, we’re wondering when CIT is going to declare his ‘conflict of interest’. Doesn’t he stand to make quite a bit of money when (if) his land is rezoned for urban development??



Lyndoch Road Residents speak out against Sprawl

Well it looks as though residents of Lyndoch Rd don’t like the idea of those tens of thousands of car movements a day past their front doors!

Lyndoch Rd speaks out

imgp1740-1r.jpg



Developers are moving in on Gawler East!

We’ve heard a rumour that a major national developer has lodged caveats over land at Gawler East!