Blogawler


Concordia Prime Agricultural Land

IMGP1707

Why would the government choose to house 15,000 people in Concordia when one of its own studies as far back as 1997 in this

Rural land assessment 1997 concluded that most of Concordia had ‘class 1′  ‘high productive potential’ ‘requiring only simple management practices to maintain productivity’.  Here’s something that is sustainable without having to try!



Community Voice

Opportunity for community to have a say.

On Monday night, the 22nd of June, a community meeting was convened at the Gawler Arms by members of the Urban Growth Boundary Community Forum Committee to look at the implications surrounding the recently released DPA for the proposed Gawler East Development.

The meeting was attended by about 80 people, including representatives from both major political parties.

Meeting Convenor Mr Paul Koch, said that the night gave local residents the opportunity to look in more detail about the implications of the development.
“Views on the night ranged from concerns about traffic, the social impact, increased demand on already stretched services through to the appropriateness of the site for a major development and whether the community has an effective voice in the consultation process.”

People at the meeting were urged to put in a submission to the State Government by the 16th of July as this will be last formal opportunity they have to influence the decision. People should indicate if they wish to speak at the public hearing on the 30th of July.

Mr Koch also said that “ people were encouraged to talk to their friends and neighbours to look closely at the issues, as the development will have a major impact on all people living in Gawler, not just the people living in Gawler East and Gawler South“.

Writing a submission

It is best to write your own, but  a form letter is available with space in the centre of the page for you to use.  Click  base form letter and save, then remove the instruction and then type in your concerns and save it.  Any further questions please e-mail us at blogawler@gmail.com.

Base form letter provides a pdf version of the framework for a submission for you to write on – open it up and print it off.

If you want to speak at the public hearing on 30th July you must indicate this in your submission.

Sending your submission.

Submissions need to arrive at the DPA Committee by 16th July.

You can post them to

Presiding Member, Development Policy Advisory Committee
C/- Department of Planning and Local Government
Level 3, 136 North Tce, Adelaide SA 5000

email them to      dpac@saugov.sa.gov.au

or place them in a collection box located at Crosby’s of Gawler, Gawler Cinemas, Willaston Bookshop and the Cheek Avenue Super Deli.  Submissions will be collected and ‘bulk mailed’ off.

If you need any help with your submissions you can contact Helen Wilmore on            85 223019 who will be able to give you a hand.



Understand the issues and then allocate funds.

 

 

The Urban Growth Community Forum Committee has written to the Minister for Urban Development, Mr Holloway regarding the approval process for the Gawler East development site.

 

The committee is calling on the Minister to ensure the approval process is not rushed and to guarantee the finances of any infrastructure needs. In particular they are calling on the Minister to conduct an Environmental Impact Study of the development on the site as this would address many of the concerns expressed by the community.

 

The committee has voiced its concerns regarding the speed at which the proposal is being pushed. Given the timetable outlined by the developer it appears decisions will be made well before critical investigation have been completed and then assessed.

 

Also, given the current economic turmoil, the committee is requesting that all infrastructure requirements be costed and budgeted for before approval is given.

In particular, given the already over crowded roads, that any SE bypass be allocated funds well before any actual work on the site begins. This will ensure any bypass will be built and not lost in State Government cutbacks to balance stretched budgets.

 

The committee is very concerned about the approval process for the Gawler East site. It feels good process is being pushed to one side at grave cost to the residents of Gawler and surrounding areas.

 



A fast track the Community doesn’t approve

 Delfin outlines its timetable for Gawler East Development.

 

The Urban Growth Community Forum Committee is very concerned about a number of planning and approval issues related to the Delfin Gawler East Development. 

The Committee has identified a number of worrying issues in the Delfin produced newsletter entitled Gawler East Development Update, Spring 2008.

 

The timetable identified by Delfin for rezoning approval seems to be out of sequence with a number of major studies that are currently being undertaken. In the timetable provided, there is no mention of major studies including the effects of traffic issues in and around Gawler. It is being suggested that the proposed Development Plan changes will go on public display before these studies are available.  “This is of major concern to people living in Gawler who already have to cope with increasingly clogged road systems and seem to be putting the cart before the horse” a committee spokesperson said.

 

The Update seems to imply that the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for the site has been signed between Delfin, Gawler Council and State Government. As we now know the State Government has not signed the agreement.

The Committee considers it is misleading to say that the MoU has been signed.  The Committee would also like to know why the Minister has been unable to sign the MoU.

 

The Delfin Update also quotes statements implying that the area has already been rezoned or that rezoning is a mere formality. For people who are not following the detail of process this could be misleading.

 

The Committee feels that there is an attempt to heighten the expectation that the development will be approved and put pressure on Government to fast track the process.

 

The Committee calls on the Minister to make a public commitment to allow all investigations and studies to be completed before rezoning is proposed.. When completed these studies should be part of the community consultation process with enough time for all issues to addressed.  The Committee notes the detailed Environmental Impact Study for the Buckland Park site and requests a similar process for Gawler East. In particular, to ensure that all infrastructure issues such as traffic, public transport, water and sewerage are dealt with along with other environmental issues such as genuinely understanding the hydrology of the site and considering the effects on ground fed springs in local rivers and the ramification to the current users of ground sourced water for human and stock needs.

 

Delfin is a large corporation with a very sophisticated media machine that is very effective in delivering their message. The Committee is calling on the Government to ensure that the community’s voice is also heard by listening to their concerns and with a commitment to not rush a decision that will have irreversible effects on the town of Gawler.

 

 

 

 



Traffic Concerns

Increasingly the wider community is becoming attuned to rising fuel prices and the cost of running a car, in particular driving to work. More and more people are using trains, buses and trams to commute to work if possible.

With the cost of fuel rising, it is becoming evident that it is not viable to simply keep pushing population growth out onto the urban fringe and then force people to rely on cars to get to work.

We currently have proposals to push the urban boundary further from the metropolitan heart. When the cost of fuel edges towards $2 a litre what will be the financial impact on people in these new developments? A more enlightened and sustainable view is to develop appropriate housing close to employment and services.

 

At a local level, traffic in and around Gawler is a constant problem. Murray Street is almost at capacity and the Government is conducting a traffic survey and looking at the impacts of different developments on traffic flows and movements.

A proposed solution is to create bypasses to accommodate the new housing developments but this will not solve the problems caused when these new residents want to travel into Gawler to access shops and services. Gawler, with its current traffic problems, is already a commercial destination, and the new developments of Target and off Para Road will draw additional traffic into the town.

 

It is inevitable that doubling our population with new housing developments will add to our traffic problems in Gawler, not solve it.

 

Hopefully the Government will start to take a more long-term view of urban development taking into account social and environmental outcomes. To do this they need to consider local concerns and not simply adopt solutions that seemed suitable last century.

 

 

 

 

 

 



Time to Think

resizeimgp1729-1.jpg  

The Barossa Council has currently  withdrawn it’s legal action against the State Government regarding the UGB so they can sit down and talk. It is a shame that the threat of legal action is one of the few ways that the Government will take community concerns seriously. 

At the moment it is unsure what the final outcome of the negations between the State Government and The Barossa Council will be, but it is tipped that the Council would prefer a separate town in behind Concordia if urban expansion has to go ahead in this region. Although this may appear to be a more palatable scenario to development in Kalbeeba and Concordia it still raises many worrying issues.For example the effects of traffic in Gawler, in particular along Lyndoch Road, the impact on infrastructure, the environmental impact, the cost of a north eastern by pass etc. 

It is also noted that the Government and the Barossa Council will be undertaking studies on some of these very issues. It is hoped that a thorough assessment and analysis be undertaken before any final decisions is made.  

On the issue of the Gawler East development it is also hoped that a thorough analysis of the proposed development is undertaken. Again the issue of traffic on Calton Road and then into Murray Street must be addressed. The social and environmental effects must also be considered.  

The community has always asked that time be taken to think about the issues around urban growth. In the first instance it must be determined that urban expansion in our region is the best option for the State.

It appears on the surface, that decisions have been made about urban expansion and new development, while solutions to problems that may follow, have yet to be addressed.   



Look before you leap

 It is disappointing to see the Government rush to expand the urban growth boundaries around Gawler without a detailed study of the implications.

Overwhelmingly the community has asked for the process to be slowed down, for detailed studies to be undertaken and then informed decisions made.Only through this process will we be able to comprehend the massive changes this sudden increase will cause to the Gawler community. 

The Barossa Council has taken legal action on behalf of its community with regards to this expansion. It is hoped that the Gawler Council will also represent the views of the community which overwhelming has asked for all the issues related to urban expansion be assessed and decisions made on sound advice.

Currently it is being rushed with a promise of  ‘creative solutions’ that have not been detailed or may never exist. 

On Thursday the 7th of  February a presentation was held in Gawler  covering the topics of   global warming, urban sprawl and water retention in the planning process. The main message to come out of the session was that global warming will have a dramatic effect on the way we live our lives. It also reinforced the message that we need to act now as a whole community to reduce our carbon footprint. The rationale of urban sprawl was discussed and an argument was put that cities should be built to reflect the human scale of living. This translates down to designing and building cities that are more appropriate to the way people would normally live their lives. Cities that are less dependant on cars create communities and consume less resources. Urban sprawl is opposite to this forcing people to rely on their cars, consume large amounts of resources and add to our carbon footprint that is directly contributing to global warming. It seems we see and hear the warning signs but continue on with ‘business as usual’ possibility with a slight green tinge.   

The impacts of urban expansion and a ‘Golden Grove’ swamping Gawler will be irreversible. It is important that before anything is approved we are confident that urban expansion around Gawler is the best solution for population growth in our State and in particular does not add to the rising carbon footprint that our State has declared it will reduce.    



Inconvenient Truths to emerge at Gawler Arms

Great to see there are some people out there who are joining the dots between climate change, urban sprawl and water security!

There’s to be a public lecture upstairs at the Gawler Arms on Thursday 7th February, 7.30pm:

Speakers are

Michael Doherty, giving former US Vice President Al Gore’s global warming talk

Paul Downton, Award-winning architect, on the environmental impact of urban sprawl

Chris Marles, Manager Commercial Development SA Water, on managing water use and retention in a sustainable way during the planning process

Hope they’ve invited some Ministers!

resizeimgp1729.jpg



Urban Growth Boundary Extension is ‘Carbon-Reckless’

How very short-sighted and disappointing that Minister Holloway has decided not only to extend the urban growth boundary but throw in an extra 79 Ha at Evanston Gardens without any consultation whatsoever!

We read with amusement yesterday that Mike Rann is aiming to make his state cabinet ‘carbon neutral’. He is quoted as saying that cabinet ministers produce an estimated 3,000 tonnes of greenhouses gases a year. Hang on a minute – what about all the extra carbon emissions emanating from their decision to allow thousands of fringe houses which will only be accessible by car?

If the state government were seriously concerned about carbon emissions they would have calculated the ‘true carbon cost’ of extending the urban growth boundary into areas like Concordia and Gawler East, where houses will be far from the city and unserviced by public transport. How different would that decision be with some ‘carbon-transparency’ involved?

‘Consultation’ without asking the public what they think, ‘Carbon Neutrality’ divorced from the consequences of cabinet decisions – At the moment it’s all just empty rhetoric and media spin from Mike Rann’s brigade of ‘Carbon-Neutral Pretenders’ aka State Cabinet.

 



Regional Land-Use Study

 

With all the talk of urban expansion in our area, it has been disappointing that up to now, no detailed study of needs and impacts of development had been undertaken.

So it is pleasing to see that the State Government recently announced it would undertake a Regional Spatial (Land – use ) Framework study of the region.

The study is aimed at guiding future urban and rural development in the area and should be a great opportunity for the community members to be involved in the consultation process.

The study will cover the area governed by The Barossa Council, District Council of Mallala, Light Regional Council, and the Town of Gawler. It will also seek input from the Wakefield Regional Council and The City of Playford.

The study aims to provide clear direction for future land use. It will identify appropriate areas for urban expansion, and areas to be preserved for agricultural uses and areas for environmental needs.

With this type of study a number of key land issues are addressed. They include:

  • Residential
  • Retail
  • industrial/ commercial
  • Tourism
  • Community services / facilities
  • Transport
  • Primary production
  • Environment
  • Natural resource management
  • Recreation, Open space and sporting facilities.

At the moment there is a perception in the community that the current push for urban expansion is industry driven and is not taking community concerns into account.

Hopefully this study will address the many concerns raised by the community. In particular we hope the wider community can have a voice during the assessment and analysis stages of this study.

It is apparently planned the study will be completed within six months which seems optimistic. It is also hoped that any declaration of an expanded urban boundary will be made after the report is finished and has been thoroughly considered by all levels of Government and in particular the community.

Get more details and have your say…. contact your Council members.